[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Audio in the Summary Screen

- To: <support@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen
- From: "Ken" <ken@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:53:11 -0800
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <BLEBKCBLHLFMNKCJFCODKEGACAAA.dcaylor@dieboldes.com>

RCR 1863. Ken -----Original Message----- From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com] On Behalf Of Donna Caylor Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:29 AM To: support@dieboldes.com Subject: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen I know I’m a newbie here, but if I can add this: I think adding an OPTION (or a flag as Greg said earlier) to hear (or see) a summary of the votes cast only makes good sense from a marketing standpoint and would keep the special interest groups happy. If a non-sighted voter doesn’t want to take the extra time to listen to such a summary (or conversely a sighted voter doesn’t want to scroll through it), then they shouldn’t be forced to – but they should have that option. Personally, the sighted voters I talked to love the summary screen on the TS (although some dislike the close proximity of the “Cast Ballot” button to the scroll bar!). I just don’t see this as a “should we” do it issue, but “how”… -----Original Message----- From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Green, Pat Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:06 AM To: 'support@dieboldes.com' Subject: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen The main thing the NFB and other ADA groups want is equality. If normally sighted people have a summary, they want a summary, too. We should consider eliminating the visual version as Greg said. (I can hear the same roars). I doubt we can really eliminate it given that it is a good sales feature, but maybe a compromise can be reached that lets us offer a similar function to both sighted and visually impaired voters. Suggestions welcome. ...Pat -----Original Message----- From: Greg Forsythe [mailto:gregf@dieboldes.com] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:50 AM To: support@dieboldes.com Subject: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen I would think the "Keep It Simple" rule should prevail. With this thought in mind, should we eliminate the visual summary screen? (I can hear the roars of NO, WE NEED IT, IT'S AN EXCELLENT FEATURE) If there is a visual summary screen, then why is there not an audio summary screen? If the ballot is so lengthy and complicated, as Steve and Sue have mentioned, turn the audio summary off with a flag. I believe we would score a lot of points with the ADA groups if this feature were added. Greg -----Original Message----- From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Don Biszmaier Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:39 AM To: support@dieboldes.com Subject: Re: Audio in the Summary Screen I am in agreement with keeeping things as simple as possible. Many users will never use half of the features and are only enterested in what it takes to get their election done. Many customers either by law or size do need special features. Is it possible to have the econlmy version for most accounts and the cadillac versions be specific to customers that have asked for the changes? Don B Donald W. Biszmaier Support Services Specialist Diebold Election Systems, Inc. 7717 Greenwood Rd. Louisville, Ky. 40258 Office 502-244-8645 Cell 502-314-6936 Fax 502-254-7835 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sue Page" <spdiebold@earthlink.net> To: <support@dieboldes.com> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 6:26 PM Subject: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen > I again express my concerns about allowing our upgrades to be customer > driven. As we all know, the customer often doesn't know what they want, or > what is best for them. I think we need to do more analysis before we add > features. As Steve points out - this upgrade adds complexity to our > product - making it slower, and with more opportunities for failure. Is that > the direction we want to take? > > Are we building a Cadillac - that our customers can't afford to purchase or > upkeep? I vote for building a really nice Honda instead. > Sue > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On > Behalf Of Steve Knecht > Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 2:42 PM > To: support@dieboldes.com > Subject: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen > > > It already takes a half hour or so to work through the CA. ballot, if you > add a summary on the ballot after each race is confirmed during the process, > it seems to me you'll add more complexity for those folks who want to skip > the summary, as most will. I'm a "no" vote on this. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On > Behalf Of Ken > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:20 AM > To: support@dieboldes.com > Subject: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen > > > > Interesting. How does it work? > > Ken > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com] > On Behalf Of Talbot Iredale > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:36 AM > To: support@dieboldes.com > Subject: Re: Audio in the Summary Screen > > Greg, > > We will be working on adding this to the next major release of > ballot > station. > > Tab > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Greg Forsythe" <gregf@dieboldes.com> > To: "Support" <support@dieboldes.com> > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:19 PM > Subject: Audio in the Summary Screen > > > > We have a Summary Screen for those with vision. Why do we not have > the > > equivalent audio screen for those who do not have vision? > > > > Why do we not have an Audio Summary screen? > > > > Greg Forsythe > > Diebold Election Systems Inc. > > Phone: (416) 446-1383 > > Fax: (416) 446-1425 > > Cell: (416) 464-3736 > > > > > > >

- References:
  - RE: Audio in the Summary Screen
    - From: "Donna Caylor" <dcaylor@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen
- Next by Date: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread