[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Nichols Lab docs

- To: tyler@gesn.com, ken@gesn.com, support@gesn.com
- Subject: Re: Nichols Lab docs
- From: "Rita Schweitz" <rita_schweitz@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 12:43:15 PST

    The documentation requirements for FEC certification through WYLE is a
    Technical Data Package which includes:
    *User Guide
    *Maintenance Manual
    *Hardware Specs
    *Software Specs

    Additional documentation we sent with I-Mark included a MS Test Script
    and Test Plan, Security Management Overview, and FEC Compliance Doc.

    If you are only taking software to Nichols I would assume that those
    docs related to hardware would not apply.  I am FedExing the entire set
    of documentation to Larry today.

    Rita

    >From owner-support@ns.gesn.com Mon Feb 15 12:04:06 1999
    >Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
    >	by ns.gesn.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA04308
    >	for support-outgoing; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 13:48:49 -0800
    >X-Authentication-Warning: ns.gesn.com: majordomo set sender to
    owner-support@gesn.com using -f
    >Received: from tlincks ([192.168.3.97])
    >	by ns.gesn.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA04304;
    >	Mon, 15 Feb 1999 13:48:44 -0800
    >Message-ID: <009a01be591e$604ca800$6103a8c0@tlincks.globalelection.com>
    >Reply-To: "Tyler" <tyler@gesn.com>
    >From: "Tyler" <tyler@gesn.com>
    >To: <ken@gesn.com>, <support@gesn.com>
    >Subject: Re: Nichols Lab
    >Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 14:04:19 -0600
    >MIME-Version: 1.0
    >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    >	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0097_01BE58EC.14CB5A70"
    >X-Priority: 3
    >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
    >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
    >Sender: owner-support@gesn.com
    >Precedence: bulk
    >
    >In point of fact, the user documentation MUST be completed before =
    >attempting certification.  It is my understanding that the
    documentation =
    >is a certification requirement.  I don't know how closely Nichols will
    =
    >scrutinize the documentation, but I wouldn't feel comfortable going =
    >forward with certification with what we have for GEMS.  Ostensibly, the
    =
    >documentation we submit to Nichols will become the "certified" =
    >documentation and we ostensibly shouldn't provide anything but that to
    =
    >customers.  But then again, with regards to the entire NASED =
    >certification process, I can never quite get a handle on the =
    >relationship between "ostensible" and "reality", but what of that...
    :-)
    >    -----Original Message-----
    >    From: Ken Clark <ken@gesn.com>
    >    To: support@gesn.com <support@gesn.com>
    >    Date: Monday, February 15, 1999 1:16 PM
    >    Subject: RE: Nichols Lab
    >   =20
    >   =20
    >        Do we intend to present GEMS software to Nichols Labs for =
    >certification purposes? If so, please indicate the time frame for the =
    >same.
    >        =20
    >        My query relates to both Georgia and Florida certifications of
    =
    >GEMS.
    >    Good question.  The obvious answer is "yes", but I don't really
    know =
    >what the time frame is.  My feeling is that adding support for the =
    >AccuTouch and AccuVote 2.0 as well as the user documentation should be
    =
    >completed before attempting any certification.  That means a few months
    =
    >at best.  I would also like to see some internal-cleanups before any =
    >source code is submitted, but I doubt we will be allowed the time to do
    =
    >that.  Appreciate that the developers aren't necessarily be in control
    =
    >of the certification process (perhaps by their nature no one is :-).
    >    =20
    >    I am not even completely clear on who is "in charge" of the =
    >certification process.  This might be a good question for Larry.  John,
    =
    >if you (or anyone else) find more definitive information on this,
    please =
    >let us know.
    >   =20
    >    Ken
    >
    >

    ______________________________________________________
    Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

- Prev by Date: Re: Nichols Lab
- Next by Date: Re: Nichols Lab docs
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread