[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Central Count Error Messages

- To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: Central Count Error Messages
- From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 12:36:47 -0800

Don't have 2.00f ROMS. Ian, I can test it if you want to forward 2.00f ROMS, but Fresno reports that this rate is far better than they had in Nov.99 -----Original Message----- From: Ken Clark <ken@dieboldes.com> To: bugtrack@dieboldes.com <bugtrack@dieboldes.com> Date: Thursday, March 02, 2000 4:38 PM Subject: RE: Central Count Error Messages 14" ballots in Marin. Fresno, running 18" ballots had these errors while running their Logic and Accuracy decks. Their feedback is that the ballots in prior revisions would have these errors every 5 ballots or so. Now we are up to every 20 to 30 or so, depending on... what I don't know. I guess my question is: Is this related to strictly a software issue, or is there some tolerance level of mark on the ballot we're coming up against? Is this in the physical world of the ballot or in the software or both?? Here is a slightly shorter answer than Guy's. Roll back to 2.00f on the same unit, feed the same ballots, and see if it actually improves anything. That will answer your question. Ken

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Central Count Error Messages
    - From: "Ian Piper" <ian@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: Central Count Error Messages
- Next by Date: Re: Central Count Error Messages
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread