[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate

- To: <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: Re: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
- From: "Nel Finberg" <nel@gesn.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:20:28 -0700
- References: <PPECJKNKLDJLKJPKPPIOEEMGCNAA.ken@gesn.com>

Absolutely nothing. Nel ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken Clark To: support@gesn.com Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 3:11 PM Subject: RE: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate It should be possible to add support for this. What's it worth to you? Ken -----Original Message----- From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Nel Finberg Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 2:27 PM To: support Subject: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate Is there any reason why an endorsement party cannot be selected when adding a registered write-in candidate? Nel

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
    - From: "Tari Runyan" <trglobal@earthlink.net>

- References:
  - RE: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
    - From: "Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
- Next by Date: Re: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread