[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Numbers of splits and report precincts in your jurisdiction

- To: <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: RE: Numbers of splits and report precincts in your jurisdiction
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 15:32:23 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <004801c0a35a$9472a7a0$0cd4fc9e@default>

From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Steve Knecht Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 2:52 PM I don't know what you mean by "precinct controller user interface" so I may not be answering your questions. (Guess - how to list base pcts on Journada?) Something like that... I don't know how that relates to nonpartisan ballot styles. But generally you'd find 3-4 non partisan ballot styles in a vote center with 4-6 precincts. Its ballot style - report precinct combinations I am really looking for. I am saying base precint just 'cause I don't want to complicate the question with parties. I'm guessing but, I'd say base precincts per vote center. % Base Precincts in VC > 1 = 99+% % Base Precincts in VC > 4 = 90% % Base Precincts in VC > 6 = 80% % Base Precincts in VC > 9 = 50% % Base Precincts in VC >12 = 15% % Base Precincts in VC >18 = <3% Well, the feedback is appreciated, but I think I need a little more hard data here. Here is what I get for Alameda using their 2000 database. #base pcts, #vcenters 1, 469 2, 303 3, 88 4, 37 5, 18 6, 8 7, 5 9, 1 10, 2 That's out of 930 odd polling vcenters. Maybe the database I am using is wrong, I dunno. But I need to know. If I design the user interface using your guess that 18% of vcenters are going to have 12+ basepcts, that is going to piss off the 100% of poll workers in Alameda that have 10 or less. And it will really piss off the 96.45% of them that have four or less. Ken

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Numbers of splits and report precincts in your jurisdiction
    - From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>

- References:
  - Re: Numbers of splits and report precincts in your jurisdiction
    - From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: Wyndotte County, KS - lost database
- Next by Date: RE: Wyndotte County, KS - lost database
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread