[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Child Districts of 'Jurisdiction Wide'

- To: "Tyler" <tyler@gesn.com>, "Support Team (E-mail)" <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: RE: Child Districts of 'Jurisdiction Wide'
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:14:11 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <001701be5c1c$79f23a30$6103a8c0@tlincks.globalelection.com>

I do not think it a good idea for GEMS to allow customers to edit the Jurisdiction Wide default district beyond perhaps changing its name. Certainly, it is hazardous to allow the creation of Child Districts of the Jurisdiction Wide district. Yes, creating child districts to Jurisdiction Wide and Not Assigned is probably not a good idea (or at best confusing). Whitman, when you get a spare moment, please see if we can disable create child for the special districts. Ken

- References:
  - Child Districts of 'Jurisdiction Wide'
    - From: "Tyler" <tyler@gesn.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: 1-5-6
- Next by Date: Reporting by tabulator/memory card
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread