[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: AVTS 4.0.11 Vote for Two race - undervoted

- To: <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: Re: AVTS 4.0.11 Vote for Two race - undervoted
- From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 18:48:16 -0700
- References: <NDBBJBKEHMHBEPDMLKOLOEFHDEAA.ljdglobal@gesn.com>

Larry, undervotes have always been associated with "vote for 2" or more while the blank or no vote is to register just that. I wouldn't recommend that the RED be for anything other than BLANK voted races or you'll have alot of RED races in some elections and the summary screen will become useless. ----- Original Message ----- From: Larry Dix To: Support@gesn.com Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 4:06 PM Subject: AVTS 4.0.11 Vote for Two race - undervoted I am trying to determine the intent of the summary screen identifying a non voted versus an under voted race. The summary screen will highlight a race in red when I fail to vote a race, indicating that I did not vote or under voted a race. When I have an option to vote for 2 and I only vote for one, the summary screen does not indicate that I under voted, it summarizes the one vote I selected. It does not highlight it in red. Was the intent to only show non voted races, or was it to indicate under voted races? If it was to show under voted races, I will submit this as a bug. Larry J. Dix Vice President of Operations Global Election Systems

- References:
  - AVTS 4.0.11 Vote for Two race - undervoted
    - From: "Larry Dix" <ljdglobal@gesn.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: AVTS 4.0.11 Vote for Two race - undervoted
- Next by Date: Re: AVTS 4.0.11 Vote for Two race - undervoted
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread