[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: GEMS 1-17-21: Base Precinct IDs are not unique within a report precinct.

- To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: GEMS 1-17-21: Base Precinct IDs are not unique within a report precinct.
- From: "Tari Runyan" <trglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:01:04 -0700
- References: <NFBBKABJOKDAFPKFEEKCOEDNCJAA.sophia@dieboldes.com>

I do not believe this is a bug as Julie moved these base precincts during Consolidation and did not add them Tari ----- Original Message ----- From: Sophia Lee To: Bug Track Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:39 AM Subject: GEMS 1-17-21: Base Precinct IDs are not unique within a report precinct. When adding a new base precinct, its assigned base precinct ID does not automatically increment. For example, Report Precinct CON 101-01 has the following base precincts: SG001-01 1-10 SG002-01 1-20 ES001-01 1-30 SG003-00 1-30 SG002-02 1-30 SG003-01 1-30 ES001-00 1-40

- Follow-Ups:
  - RE: GEMS 1-17-21: Base Precinct IDs are not unique within a report precinct.
    - From: "Sophia Lee" <sophia@dieboldes.com>

- References:
  - GEMS 1-17-21: Base Precinct IDs are not unique within a report precinct.
    - From: "Sophia Lee" <sophia@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: BS 4.2.2 Headers being programmed on Ballot Station only withVotergroup1 attributes
- Next by Date: Fw: Pennsylvania cross-endorse certification Vote for 3
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread