[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: City's original vote totals flawed

- To: <support@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: City's original vote totals flawed
- From: "Nel Finberg" <nel@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 11:22:14 -0800
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <005901c2925b$911cfaf0$1e02af0a@dieboldes.com>

> The article refers to absentee processing, hence they would be referring to the AccuVote-OS. They probably tested their absentee memory cards in Election Mode, forgetting to reset to Pre-Election Mode, then set to Election Mode again. The fact that the AccuVote-OS unit(s) used for absentee processing did not print a Zero Totals tape presumably eluded the county technical support representative. Nel -----Original Message----- From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com] On Behalf Of Ken Sent: November 22, 2002 11:16 AM To: support@dieboldes.com Subject: RE: City's original vote totals flawed The thing I don’t get about the article is what happened to the zero totals tape. That is the first thing you do in the morning, and every poll worker has to sign it. It’s not like you can miss 37 test ballots. Was this a matter of the operating procedure being to not print the tape b/c it is too long? If this is the case, we really have to get this situation improved by implementing a proper summary report on the AVTS. This has been done for the 4.4 release, if it is any consolation. I don’t like blaming pollworkers in cases like this, as the article seems to do. The software needs to suck less. Ken -----Original Message----- From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com] On Behalf Of Donna Caylor Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:33 AM To: support@dieboldes.com Subject: RE: City's original vote totals flawed To the right of the article, you can click on “Shops” or “Places Nearby” and it indicates Columbus, Georgia. -----Original Message----- From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Nel Finberg Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:35 PM To: support@dieboldes.com Subject: RE: City's original vote totals flawed The reference to Kennesaw State University at the bottom of the article makes me think this must be Columbus, Georgia. When posting articles such as these, perhaps we could make a point of indicating the state, given the amount of states a county or city of a certain name may occur in. Nel -----Original Message----- From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com] On Behalf Of Steve Knecht Sent: November 22, 2002 10:32 AM To: support@dieboldes.com; announce@dieboldes.com Subject: RE: City's original vote totals flawed This is a Diebold site??? Was this Columbus Ohio? Georgia? Who can we call to discuss this with? -----Original Message----- From: owner-announce@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-announce@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of lesley@dieboldes.com Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:36 AM To: announce@dieboldes.com Subject: City's original vote totals flawed This Story has been sent to you by : lesley@dieboldes.com
>     City's original vote totals flawed
>     When all the vote tabulations were finally completed the morning after the Nov. 5 general election, unofficial totals from Columbus' first use of the new voting system were released for publication.
>     The full article will be available on the Web for a limited time:
>     https://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/enquirer/news/local/4567841.htm
>     (c) 2001 enquirer and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved.

- References:
  - RE: City's original vote totals flawed
    - From: "Ken" <ken@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: Audio in the Summary Screen
- Next by Date: Re: AccuVote TS errors and software
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread